Wednesday, November 30, 2005
  Bizarro Narnia!

The current issue of National Review features a cover story by John J. Miller about the upcoming first movie in the Narnia series, The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe. It's a good article, and a shocking one. Shocking because it details plans once hatched by Paramount to produce a LW&W movie that would have outraged fans of the book:

During the 1990s... Paramount owned the film rights to The Chronicles of Narnia and began to develop a script for The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe. Moving the book’s setting from wartime Britain to modern Los Angeles (and replacing air raids with earthquakes) was the least of its flaws: The Pevensie children apparently entered Narnia not through a wardrobe but through a swimming pool, and the White Witch tempted Edmund not with Turkish delight but with cheeseburgers and hot dogs. Worst of all, Hollywood proposed that perhaps Aslan shouldn’t be killed.


(Emphasis added.)

Thank God... literally... that this planned "adaptation" fell through.

Miller, by the way, hits the nail on the head with his summation of what the Narnia stories are for, and why Lewis wrote them:

Lewis worried that the right imaginative stories were in short supply. (Another subtle theme of the Narnia books is the inadequacy of British schooling.) “There is too little of what we really like in stories,” Lewis once told Tolkien. “I am afraid we shall have to try to write some ourselves.” In offering Narnia, one of his main goals was to save children from his own fate of falling into the snare of disbelief. Lewis believed that a powerful sense of compulsion spoiled his religious upbringing. “Why did one find it so hard to feel as one was told one ought to feel about God or about the sufferings of Christ?” he once asked (in what was for him an uncommonly stilted passage). “I thought the chief reason was that one was told one ought to. An obligation to feel can freeze feelings.” Then he continued: “But supposing that by casting all these things into an imaginary world, stripping them of their stained-glass and Sunday School associations, one could make them for the first time appear in their real potency.” If war is the continuation of politics by other means, then Narnia is the continuation of Sunday school by different devices...

“I am aiming at a sort of pre-baptism of the child’s imagination,” (Lewis) once said.


It's an excellent article. National Review is always well worth the cover price, and this article is the icing on the cake of the current issue.

 
Comments:
Holy cow. Imagine the uproar if that awful adaptation had gone through. Sometimes it's staggering to realize just how much Hollywood doesn't get it.
 
I don't have the specific link at my fingertips (somebody can Google it if so desired), but there was also plans by Harper Collins to "rewrite" the Narnia books to remove the Christian allegory.
 
Nefarious plots afoot; it does make one tend to the cynical.

Are you going to write us a review on the 10th or so?
 
Post a Comment





film geeks rating system

request a review

Wendy on the MPAA

Wendy's Favorite Movies

Darrell's Favorite Movies




Darrell Wendy

Send Them E-Mail


Family Homepage

Tales from the Dorkside

SouthCon





Celebrity Cola
Chronicles of Narnia Blog
The Chronicles of Rhodester
Darkmatters
FastForward Film Reviews
Good News Reviews
Lorna In Wonderland
MCF's Nexus of Improbability
MovieBob
My Wife Works In A Video Store
Nehring The Edge
Paradoxes and Problems
Poop'D Culture
Truth Laid Bear
The Write Jerry




Ain't It Cool News
Ebert and Roeper
Film Rot
Film Threat
Flipside Movie Emporium
Hollywood Jesus
The IMDb
indieWIRE
JoBlo's Movie Emporium
Movie City Geek News
Movie Origins
The Onion A.V. Club
The Oracle of Bacon
Q Network Reviews
Roger Ebert
Rotten Tomatoes
Screen It!
Widescreen Advocacy Page
Yahoo! Movies




Guess Which Movie
The Oracle of Bacon










































Powered by Blogger